DWP/BB/031/07
This circular provides guidance on the application of discretion when a warning would be inappropriate before and during an attendance review meeting and trade union representation.
A manager is expected to “consider all known circumstances and have a possible course of action in mind” before the meeting with the employee and their trade union representative (procedures 3.2). Preparation for the meeting by the manager may include asking their own manager for advice or the ES customer support team (para 3.1). Managers must put their reasons in writing and consult others, such as their manager or a more senior manager, before informing the employee of the decision when applying their discretion not to give a warning. This means that cases in which a warning is clearly not appropriate should be excluded from the warning procedures without the need for a review meeting.
When the manager thinks a warning may be appropriate they must send the employee a written invitation to attend an attendance review meeting (procedures 3.3/appendix 1). The purpose of this meeting is not properly explained but the key provision listed in the procedures (para 3.8) is the right to be accompanied by a trade union representative with a statutory right to address the manager.
At this point the manager becomes accountable to both the employee and their trade union representative under the terms of the Employment Relations Act 1999 which require, as amended, in section 102B, that:
The employer must permit the trade union representative to:
a) address the hearing in order to do any or all of the following –
b) confer with the worker during the hearing
Failure to comply with the statutory rights under section 102B may be the subject of a complaint to an employment tribunal under section 11 of the act. Where a tribunal finds that a complaint under this section is well founded it shall order the employer to pay compensation to the worker of an amount not exceeding two weeks pay.
The manager who hears the employees case at this review meeting is the decision maker. Decision making standards are published in the HR decision makers guide.
The proper purpose of the meeting is to –
The appropriate application of the managers discretion may also be reviewed on the basis that a warning may be inappropriate after considering:
These considerations are listed under the attendance advice section Q24 and are as relevant at the start of the attendance management process as at the end.
DWP attendance management policy (para 4) confirms that “warnings are not automatic but must be given unless one of the exceptions applies”.
DWP attendance procedures (para 3.2 (b)) list eleven circumstances in which warnings will not be given together with the discretion not to give a warning “in circumstances not listed”. There are therefore twelve exceptions which are intended to safeguard against warnings, together with the legal requirement to comply with statutory rights.
PCS advice for branches and members is published in:
DWP/BB/108/06 HR decision makers guide
DWP/MB/006/07 Your attendance management rights
DWP/MB/007/07 Your grievance and trade union rights
DWP/BB/23/07 Attendance management improvement warnings
DWP/BB/24/07 Attendance management and “one off” absences
Employees have the right to use the grievance procedures when dissatisfied with a warning. Details of warnings that have been wrongly given and not corrected under the grievance procedures should be provided to PCS DWP group office. Evidence of problems with the operation of policy and procedures is needed to support the case for further improvements.