These materials and information are available from PCS PRIBS (Policy, Research, Information & Bargaining Support department) if you have any difficulty in obtaining them direct.
PCS is happy to assist with any specific queries on equal pay auditing.
Detailed advice on equal pay auditing has been issued by the Cabinet Office:
Equal Pay: Guidance on Equal Pay for Government Departments and Agencies, January 2002 - available to people involved in Civil Service and NDPB pay reviews
Advice is also issues by the Equal Opportunities Commission:
Code of Practice on Equal Pay, and specific guidance documents available on the Equal Opportunities Commission web site.
PCS published an internal Policy Brief giving basic guidance on equal pay reviews in 2002 (pb002-02), and Policy Brief (pb036-03)
The National Pay Framework and National Pay Claims 2004 - Building the Campaign via Equal Pay cases explains the role of legal cases in the PCS pay strategy.
The TUC runs training courses for Equal Pay reps across the UK - information on contacts, venues and schedules can be found on the TUC web site.
The pay system should:
The job evaluation system should:
The Equal Opportunities Commission advises that whatever the size of the organisation and whatever kind of equal pay review process is used, it should include:
If the exercise does not include these elements, it cannot claim to be an equal pay review.
The Equal Opportunities Commission also points out that a review is not simply a data collection exercise, but must also entail a commitment to put right any sex based pay inequalities and have the support of managers with the authority to deliver the necessary changes.
The Equal Opportunities Commission model has five steps:
Listed below are some standard types of data that should be collected and analysed when auditing pay (it is based on gender, but the same analyses can be used for disability and ethnicity).
These basic data should be supplemented by other data relevant to your particular organisation, especially if specific problems have been identified.
It is sometimes helpful to do a more detailed analysis of particular grades, or to collect data on length of service, earnings of part-time workers etc.
A consistent approach should be adopted, for example using hourly rates or full-time equivalent annual salaries and specifying the type of analysis - e.g. median or mean averages, so that comparisons are meaningful.
Each of the following elements of the reward package should be assessed on the amount, criteria and level of access available to men and women in the organisation, the proportion of men and women who receive this element and the average amounts received.
Proposals need to be checked on how they are or will be implemented and the impact they have or are likely to have. In terms of equal pay law, it is how pay practices actually affect pay that matters - not the intention behind them.
Any gaps of 5% or more, or patterns of 3% or more, should be examined more closely to establish whether they are genuinely caused by factors unrelated to gender or whether remedial action needs to be put in place.
Please rate how useful you found this page, 1 star for not very useful and 5 for very useful.